Focus On The Future

LIST VOTE

FOURTH TOOL: List-Vote Method

TRG LIST/VOTE METHOD:

   A means of listing and prioritizing alternatives considered by a group:

OPENING:

A demonstration list/vote is held to start the session

a.   The Leader writes the group/question/date on a flipchart or central screen

LISTING: 

Each answer that any individual member raises will be written on the page headed with the question.

a.    The Leader proposes a simple written form of each answer.

b.    The words chosen must be approved by the individual making the suggestion.

c.     Every answer is listed even if the answer might be a duplicate.

d.    Discussion is valuable, but no one may argue against an item on the list other than to suggest an alternative be listed.

COMBINING:

The Leader helps the group combine answers that are the same.

a.    No one may order someone else's answer be edited or eliminated.

CONDUCTING THE POLL:

a.    The group "votes" the list, identifying preferences

i.    Each member has a set of four ‘Cards’ from which to select an answer.

ii.   Votes are never ‘for or against,’ but selected from the 4 answers below.

iii.  The groups ‘votes’ for each item at the same time, by each placing a chosen card face down in front of them, then revealing them all at once.

b.   The resulting list is re-written on a flipchart sheet in the order shown by the vote.

c.   A shortened results list may then be ‘voted’ to clarify key targets.

RANKING:

Each individual is asked to vote every item on the list into one of the four categories shown on the cards:

1)  = Critical (essential in nature, must be done to achieve success)

2)  = Significant (greatly improves the prospect of success)

3)  = Some Value (has a potential for being worthwhile)

4)  = No Value (value returned is less than the effort expended)

CONTAINING DEBATE:  In order to limit the potential of spiraling dispute:

a.  Looping back to argue ideas that where listed, voted and ranked should be limited, unless part of a follow-up ‘listing and voting’ sequence.

EXAMPLE OF OUTCOME:

Question:  “How important is it that we plan together?”

Resulting Answer with 9 people voting:  2/6/1/0 

a.    2 voted the item “Critical”

b.    6 voted the item “Significant value”

c.     1 voted the item “Some value”

d.    0 voted the item “No value”

Conclusion: “Having the team plan together is most valuable to this group.”